Sunday, 25 January 2026

KODAK PRINTOMATIC

KODAK PRINTOMATIC

After giving some thought to what I wanted I went to the usual place, Amazon, I did a search for “instant camera” and the first one shown was an Instax Mini but on reading some of the specifications I realised it needed batteries and that was not an option for me, I wanted a camera that has a rechargeable battery so the Instax is not an option. So let me scroll down a little further and near the bottom I find the Kodak Printomatic and, on paper, it ticks all the right boxes.


 Console  Kodak Printomatic 
 Dimensions 3” high, 4.7” wide, 0.9” deep 
 Battery 7.4V Lithium-Ion
 Paper Capacity  Can hold up to 3 images
 Print Tech ZINK (Zero Ink) High-Quality, Smudge-Proof &
 Water-Resistant Prints

 Image Sensor  5MP Lens: wide-angle 8mm
 Aperture f/2
 Indicators Printer, Low Battery, Low Paper, Low Memory Storage 
 Storage External Memory: microSD up to 32GB

24 hours after purchase and it arrives at my front door while I am in, however it arrives at my front door without my knowledge, most annoying. It is left on my doorstep in an Amazon package stating it contains electrical equipment in the pouring rain, thankfully on checking my emails on my laptop I see I have been left a package. I also made sure to purchase extra Zink (Zero Ink) paper at the same time. I have used Zink paper before in a small handheld printer I have so I know the technology is tried and tested.


Seeing the camera above you may think it looks more like a toy than a camera, personally I thought exactly the same thing when I saw it but that wasn't an issue for me. On opening the packaging and reading the quick start guide it took me less than one minute to be taking pictures. It was literally a case of opening the back, placing the included 5 sheets of Zink paper in the rear of the camera, face down, closing the back then just point and click, it even makes the noise of an old 35mm camera shutter.

My camera skills are not the best so I wasn't expecting Lord Lichfield quality pictures but I was expecting some quality. Maybe I was expecting too much of this budget camera. A 5MP lens is not the ideal image resolution for photographs. I think I'll try taking photos outside and in other locations to see if I get better results.

Would I Recommend This Camera?
The quick answer is no. Having seen the pictures I had taken I wasn't impressed. My first picture was overexposed so I thought bad lighting, I took a picture elsewhere in the house and it was almost black. I took three more pictures around the house and not a single photo I would want to show anyone.

Next Step?
There is the Kodak Printomatic+ but exactly how much of a step up is that? I have had a quick look at the specifications online and it appears the only real difference is the lens is now 10MP, personally not really worth it.

Follow and comment below

Michael

Thursday, 15 January 2026

iPOD TOUCH 7TH GENERATION IN 2026

iPOD TOUCH 7TH GENERATION

On my search around the house for microSD cards, USB leads, power leads etc (quite a common practice) I found my old, blue, iPod Nano 7th Generation and my iPod Touch 5th Generation, both great MP3 players. I liked the size of the iPod Nano and brightness of the display, I also thought it the perfect size for just throwing in a pocket or bag but on charging and starting up I found the screen to be corrupt and unusable as for the iPod Touch 5th Generation I found the storage space a bit lacking, only 64gb, for my catalogue of music as it stands now. So now to purchase the most up to date iPod Touch I could, the last produced was iPod Touch 7th Generation so I decided to get myself one with 256gb storage.


I think that most people these days would say, "Why do you need an MP3 player when you have your smartphone with you?" Personally, I always thought it was handy to have a music player that has one purpose that it does extremely well, which iPods (all makes and models) used to do, and they did it exceptionally well. When you consider that the original iPod which was released on 10th November 2001 and my recently purchased iPod Touch 7th Generation which was originally released on May 28th 2019 and discontinued on May 10th 2022 still functions as they were originally intended 7 years on. Apart from the iPod Nano screen which is probably fixable, not looked into this though.


 Nano 7th Gen  Touch 5th Gen  Touch 7th Gen 
 Release  Sept 7 2005 Oct 11th 2012 May 28 2019
 OS 1.0.4/1.1.2 iOS 6.0
 iOS 12.3
 CPU X 
 Cortex-A9 Apple A5  Apple M10
 Graphics  X SGX543MP2  GT7600 plus
 Memory X 512MB DRAM  2GB LPDDR4 
 Storage 1-16gb 16, 32 or 64gb 32, 128 or 256gb
 Display 2.5" LCD 4" Multitouch LED 4" Multitouch IPS
 Rear Camera  N/A 5MP 8MP
 Front Camera  N/A 1.2MP 1.2MP
 Wi-Fi N/A 802.11a/b/g/n 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac 
 Bluetooth 4.0 4.0 4.1

When it comes to the software needed for the computer side of things, everyone used iTunes which was also released in 2001 alongside the original iPod. I loved the coverflow view in iTunes on my computer and once installed on a modern(ish) laptop it is just as I remember. Easy to navigate and find the music I want.


Once the iPod Touch 7th Generation is connected via a lightening connector, this connector now discontinued, to the laptop iTunes recognises it straight away and it is ready to sync my music and music videos. Unfortunately some of my music is in WMA and MP4 format which has caused a few issues such as duplicate files and the need to convert files to MP3, this is no great hardship just a little time consuming.

Is iTunes still needed?
Doing a quick search online it does appear that iTunes is no longer the only software available and that there are paid and unpaid alternatives that can be used such as WinAmp, MediaMonkey but for that authentic feel I decided to go with iTunes.

Official & Primary Software
Apple Music/iTunes: The default for managing and syncing music, movies, and other media between your computer (Mac/PC) and your iPod.

Third-Party Alternatives (Windows & Mac)
CopyTrans (Manager/Transcoder): Excellent for managing music and transferring files to/from your iPod without iTunes on Windows
TouchCopy: Transfers music and other content from your iPod to your computer or iTunes on both Mac and PC, supporting older click-wheel iPods
MediaMonkey: A powerful media manager for Windows that can sync with iPods and use tools like qaac for high-quality encoding.
Syncios: Offers comprehensive file transfer and management for iOS devices, including iPods.
Sharepod: One of the original tools for transferring music from iPods back to your computer.

MediaMonkey

Custom Firmware & Advanced Options
Rockbox: An open-source firmware replacement for certain older iPods, adding features, file format support, and customization.

Key Considerations
iPod Model: Older iPods (Classic, Nano, Shuffle) work best with older iTunes versions or dedicated managers, while iPod Touch uses iOS.
Apple Music Subscription: Most older iPods cannot use the Apple Music subscription service; they play purchased or ripped music.
Direct Transfer: You can often treat older iPods as external drives to drag-and-drop files, bypassing playlist management.

Would I recommend someone getting a second-hand iPod these days?
If you are planning on purchasing an iPod in 2026 do a lot of research, examine what storage space you may need for your music catalogue and how much music will you need while you’re out, do you travel a lot and therefore need a lot more music storage space with you. If you find your smartphone adequate for your needs then a separate music player is probably not for you, however if your smartphone is used for phone purposes only but you want music while out and about then the answer is probably yes. I also found a music player handy while hoovering.

Do you need a music player with a screen?
Having a screen is nice but is it essential for your needs, only you can decide. I have had music players with screens and without and I prefer a music player with a screen just so you can look at the player and see the album artwork and know straight away who the artist is and the album name.

Follow and comment below

Michael